Changes in public energy policies and the political framework of market regulation in the countries where the Group operates, such as the energy-climate act or the Multi-year Energy Programme (PPE) in France, or the “Green deal” in Europe, are likely to lead to profound changes in the Group’ governance or business portfolio. These could hinder the Group’s development in relation to its competitors or undermine its ability to meet its commitment to climate protection
By decree of 21 April 2020, the French government adopted the Multi annual Energy Programming (PPE) which sets out the government’s priorities for action in the field of energy for the continental metropolis for the period 2019-2028.
In particular, in this context:
The Energy-Climate Act was enacted on 8 November 2019. It specifies the key points of the energy and ecological transition policy in France and updates the objectives set by the energy transition act for green growth.
In particular:
The Act also specifies the procedure concerning the Strategic Business Plan (PSE),which will have to cover both periods of the Multi-year Energy Programme (PPE), be made public (with the exception of information relating to business secrecy), and present the accompanying measures put in place for employees as a result of the closure of nuclear or thermal power stations. In the event that the PSE is incompatible with the PPE, the act provides for a formal notice followed, if necessary, by sanctions.
The European legal framework, which notably organises the liberalisation of the energy sector and climate and energy policies, underwent significant changes in 2019 with the finalisation of the Clean Energy Package and is likely to evolve in the future, in particular through the “Green deal”.
The “Green deal”, a flagship mechanism of the new European Commission, is likely to include key provisions for the energy sector in general and the EDF group in particular. In this context, the foundations for important changes in the European legal framework applicable to the energy sector and affecting climate and energy policies were laid in 2020 with the publication by the EuropeanCommission of several strategies and a limited number of concrete legislative proposals on infrastructure and sustainable finance. The potential consequences could be as follows:
In 2020, the legal framework for the European Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance was set out in more detail. At the end of 2020, the taxonomy delegated act proposed by the Commission did not include nuclear power, which was dealt within a specific process; referred to restrictions on hydraulic works that go beyond the applicable European legal framework; and proposed an emission threshold for low-carbon hydrogen that would not allow the hydrogen produced from the French electricity mix to be classified as sustainable. EDF continues to be strongly active on this subject, even though the Council and the European Parliament have the right to veto the text in its entirety. This poses a major risk for the Group, as the exclusion of nuclear power could seriously hamper the Group’s ability to finance itself.
In addition, the negotiations that the French State began in 2020 with theEuropean Commission on the new regulation of existing nuclear power will continue in 2021.
These developments could be unfavourable to the Group and could adversely affect its ability to meet its commitment to climate protection. In particular, they could result in insufficient asset compensation, not be in line with the Group’s development objectives, change the competitive environment in which the Group operates, change the level of regulated tariffs or affect the profitability of current or future production units or any of the Group’s other activities. In general, the legislative and regulatory framework put in place in France, in Europe or in the countries where the EDF group is present is likely to have a significant impact on the Group’s results or its business model.